The public title explicitly identifies the video as a non-sponsored review.
Loading reviewed evidence
By Dr. Vanita Rattan . Browse the products reviewed in this clip, with the source kept close by.
Watch on YouTube ↗Commercial context attached to this reviewed clip.
The public title explicitly identifies the video as a non-sponsored review.
The description and several interstitial sections promote the creator's own skincare range, clinic, and pigmentation products; those products are excluded from K-beauty mentions.
16 products with a reviewed source reference.
Niacinamide and hydration are acknowledged, but perfume, surfactant concerns, and insufficient brightening actives leave the creator disappointed.
The creator would purchase it herself, praises the actives and fragrance-free formula, and calls it a keeper.
Third-ingredient alcohol, fragrance, rough pad material, and PHA combination are called horrendous and deliberately irritating.
Ferments and hydration are praised, but multiple fragrance components lead to an explicit instruction to avoid the product.
Useful centella, licorice, and humectants are outweighed by multiple essential oils; the creator says the product is a pass.
Called refreshing and really loved, particularly for an inflamed or irritated skin barrier.
The light feel is enjoyable, but the creator calls the strong fragrance excessive and unnecessary for repeated use.
Green tea and hydrating ingredients are praised, but added fragrance leads to a direct instruction not to waste money.
Morning-and-night glycolic acid use is rejected for skin of color because of irritation and pigmentation risk; rated two out of ten.
The formula does what it claims for nourishment and hydration and is explicitly approved.
Lovely, soothing, and hydrating for a damaged barrier, but the 100% centella claim is criticized as misleading and no brightening or texture benefit is expected.
Liked for its simple fragrance-free formula, but daily PHA use is rejected for skin of color; suggested at night no more than twice weekly.
The creator says she would have recommended it without tea tree oil, but does not recommend the product as formulated.
Effective niacinamide level is acknowledged, but fragrance and an exfoliating ferment make the creator reject it for skin of color.
Approved as hydrating and conditioning for dry, dehydrated, sensitive, or rosacea-prone skin, but not expected to materially brighten pigmentation.
Anti-inflammatory and barrier-supportive formula without denatured alcohol, fragrance, or essential oils; explicitly approved.